One can always say that it is the hunter and not the weapon that is whether they are ethical or not ethical. However, in many places hunter over crowding is real issue, it takes all of the adventure out of the hunt. On our public hunting lands and many of the private tracks there is intense competition for hunting space and locations. Some of the people that gravitate to the easy way in my neighborhood are not ethically fit enough to call themselves hunters, harsh perhaps, but it is the truth. I have too many examples to list them all here, but I will give one. A man that I have known all my life, went to crossbows the first time his shoulder felt stiff and he could get the permit, put up fake illegal tree stands at the base of a ravine that he was hunting. Nice bright new wood with what looked like they could be just leverage stands if they were made out of metal. He even strapped on 2x4 steps to access them in a solid but barely legal method. It all looked ingenious, two bright and shiny wood stands right there for anyone to use. The problem was they were designed to fall and he was proud of them when I caught him putting them up, he put them up to keep other hunters out of 'his' ravine. As a friend, he warned me to not use them. The reason for this, is there were two Pope and Young bucks running that area, and even though he had 500 acres of private land all to himself, he wanted those bucks. I climbed up one the next day and put some weight on it, it crashed to the ground. I kicked the other out as well and carried the wood to junk pile of a neighboring farm. We have a one either sex tag in Iowa, and later both of those bucks were shot in consecutive days by a longbow and recurve shooter, he covered the area with legal tree stands, mostly so no one else had a good place to hang their own tree stand. One 60 acre piece of Iowa and two slob hunters, one with a crossbow and the other with a longbow.