3Rivers Archery




The Trad Gang Digital Market














Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters




RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS

TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS


Got a new bow today. Well, an old one - '69 Super Kodiak for '66 Kodiak

Started by tomsm44, September 09, 2015, 10:35:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tomsm44

I have a '69 Super Kodiak, 60", 70#@28".  Its not being used right now because I don't like shooting that much weight.  I have an opportunity to trade it for a '66 Kodiak, 60", 55#@28".  I have several other bows from 42# up to 53# that I shoot and hunt with, so I don't really need another, but I figure I'd be more likely to actually shoot and hunt with the 55# one than the 70# one.  I haven't seen the '66 in person, but the pictures look to be similar condition to mine and the guy said he recently bought it from Big Jim. So my question is this:  Do you guys think this would be a good deal to make?  How do the values of the two bows compare?  The guy I'm talking to sounds like he would actually shoot mine rather than just hang it on the wall.  At the least, there'd be two old Bears getting a little more woods time if I make the trade.
Matt Toms

Flatwoods Custom R/D:  64", 47@28
'66 Kodiak: 60", 55@28
Redwing Hunter:  58", 53@28
Ben Pearson 709 Hunter:  58", 47@28
Ben Pearson 709 Hunter:  58", 42@28
Hoots Recurve:  56", 42@28

Recurve7


Whip

If they were equal weights the 69' should be worth a little more.   It's tough to find buyers for heavy bows though, so they don't hold value nearly as well. But that 55# weight is a lot more desirable, so it sounds like a fair trade to me.  I'd much rather have a bow that I could actually shoot.
PBS Regular Member
WTA Life Member
In the end, it is not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years. Abraham Lincoln.

Ray Lyon

QuoteOriginally posted by Whip:
If they were equal weights the 69' should be worth a little more.   It's tough to find buyers for heavy bows though, so they don't hold value nearly as well. But that 55# weight is a lot more desirable, so it sounds like a fair trade to me.  If much rather have a bow that I could actually shoot.
Yup. That's it.
Tradgang Charter Member #35

Cyclic-Rivers

Relax,

You'll live longer!

Charlie Janssen

PBS Associate Member
Wisconsin Traditional Archers


>~TGMM~> <~Family~Of~The~Bow~<

dbd870

I'd do it in a heartbeat; 70# is a heavy bow and not nearly as popular as a 55#
SWA Spyder

Ron LaClair

I've got a 70# 1967 super Kodiak that I bought new in 67. I shot 2219's with Zwickey Delta's and always had complete pass through's. The bow has hung in my shop unused for years. Take the 55 pounder, you won't regret it.
We live in the present, we dream of the future, but we learn eternal truths from the past
When you were born, you cried and the world rejoiced. Live your life so that when you die, the world cries and you rejoice.
Life is like a wet sponge, you gotta squeeze it until you get every drop it has to offer

david janssen

I would also go with the 66 Kodiak.They are my favorite year,I love the brown glass with the white overlays.And it's my birth year.The grip on the 66 may be a bit larger than the Super K.
David Janssen

Sam McMichael

Assuming its in good condition, it would probably be a good trade. Since you don't like to shoot 70#, the other bow would be more useful.
Sam

Producer

I have a 1970 S-K and I have been told that 1968 to 1970 are the most desireable. That being said I don't think there is much if any dollar value difference because 70 lb bows have a small market today. Trade for the one you will shoot.
What gives me wings? Flying with my arrows over and over again. And never giving up...For giving up means not believing...

tomsm44

Thanks for all the input guys.  I'm thinking I'll go ahead and make the trade.  Now, anybody know what it'll cost to ship a recurve from N Louisiana to central Tx?
Matt Toms

Flatwoods Custom R/D:  64", 47@28
'66 Kodiak: 60", 55@28
Redwing Hunter:  58", 53@28
Ben Pearson 709 Hunter:  58", 47@28
Ben Pearson 709 Hunter:  58", 42@28
Hoots Recurve:  56", 42@28

Cyclic-Rivers

Hard to guess on shipping, a lot will depend on your box. I expect you will pay 30 bucks give or take 10,  depending on means and insurance.
Relax,

You'll live longer!

Charlie Janssen

PBS Associate Member
Wisconsin Traditional Archers


>~TGMM~> <~Family~Of~The~Bow~<

tomsm44

That's not too bad.  The guy I'm dealing with offered to ship his first and let me use the same box to send mine to him.
Matt Toms

Flatwoods Custom R/D:  64", 47@28
'66 Kodiak: 60", 55@28
Redwing Hunter:  58", 53@28
Ben Pearson 709 Hunter:  58", 47@28
Ben Pearson 709 Hunter:  58", 42@28
Hoots Recurve:  56", 42@28

Cyclic-Rivers

When you get his box, there will be a  sticker for how much he paid, You will know what to expect in the  return shipping.
Relax,

You'll live longer!

Charlie Janssen

PBS Associate Member
Wisconsin Traditional Archers


>~TGMM~> <~Family~Of~The~Bow~<

tomsm44

Well, I made the trade and the '66 showed up today.  It's a beautiful bow indeed.  A few light handling marks but nothing major considering it's almost 60 years old.  I actually think I like the wood riser better than the phenolic one, regardless of which one is worth more.  I definitely like the brown glass better for a hunting bow.  I took it out and shot it a few times and I don't think I'm going to regret making the swap at all.  55# is still a little heavier than the 47# I've been shooting all summer, but it's manageable, and boy is it a sweet shooter.  Another nice surprise, my arrows for my old 53# Red Wing Hunter flew perfectly off of it.  Since I won't have to do a bunch of tuning work or arrow buying, if I get a kill with my new longbow pretty early, this one may actually see some woods time this year.  Here's a couple pics of the two together.  Probably be a long time before I have two collectable Bear bows like this at the same time again.  



Matt Toms

Flatwoods Custom R/D:  64", 47@28
'66 Kodiak: 60", 55@28
Redwing Hunter:  58", 53@28
Ben Pearson 709 Hunter:  58", 47@28
Ben Pearson 709 Hunter:  58", 42@28
Hoots Recurve:  56", 42@28

Cavscout9753

They both look good. If he can handle a 70#'er then Id say you both won out!
ΙΧΘΥΣ

threeundr

Sounds like you made a good trade to me! Two nice looking bows you have there. BTW, they are only almost 50 years old, not 60. For a minute there you were beginning to make me a little older than I really am. Lol!
-Leonard-

tomsm44

Matt Toms

Flatwoods Custom R/D:  64", 47@28
'66 Kodiak: 60", 55@28
Redwing Hunter:  58", 53@28
Ben Pearson 709 Hunter:  58", 47@28
Ben Pearson 709 Hunter:  58", 42@28
Hoots Recurve:  56", 42@28

Cyclic-Rivers

Relax,

You'll live longer!

Charlie Janssen

PBS Associate Member
Wisconsin Traditional Archers


>~TGMM~> <~Family~Of~The~Bow~<

Ray Lyon

They're both beautiful, however unless it's a mint collectable wallhanger (which I don't have any of), I want to be able to use it to hunt with, so your's was the right decision.  Enjoy your bow!
Tradgang Charter Member #35


Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement
Copyright 2003 thru 2025 ~ Trad Gang.com ©