Originally posted by Zradix:
Well Chuck..I think you are on the right path..
As a very general rule..
Deeper cored bows have lighter mass limbs.
all else being equal (which it hardly ever is) a lighter limb makes a faster bow with less feedback.
If you double the width of a limb you double the mass and double the draw weight.
If you double the thickness you double the mass and increase the draw weight appx 8 fold I believe.
So....a 50# deep cored limb can have a lot lighter mass limb than a wide/thin cored limb.
now....shallow cored limbs can bend more ie curve more during the draw than a deep cored limb.
which is why working recurve tips are generally wide and thin.
....and why "serious" r/d bows generally have wider limbs than "less serious" r/d bows....they gotta be able to make more of a curve.
The optimum balance between deeper core or wider limb is determined by the design of the bow and the materials used.
.....need to make sure those limbs don't want to twist or bend sideways...lol
Hope this helps a bit.
Great explaination John!
The only thing i might add is that deep core long bow limbs can take on different characteristics depending on material used in the core and how many laminations used in the limb...... Of course a heavier draw weight bow is going to be thicker than a light weight bow, the thickness can be minupulated by the core to glass ratio....
Typically thinner glass deeper core for light weight bows are much better performance......
For radical r/d long bows its a real balancing act to maintain good lateral stability using narrow deep core limbs.... Dan Toelke knows the value of using more thin laminations in his long bows....
Just for fun John take a look at the edge of your whip at the tips.... i'll bet he's got 4-5 lams not counting glass.... Dan builds a nice bow...